Charta is on Google Play: practise on the go. Get the app
Charta

Contrast monopoly, perfect competition and the market structures in between

CFA® Level I · Economics · The Firm and Market Structures · EC.4.a

The idea

Market structures differ in how much power a seller has over price. Under perfect competition firms are price takers: many sellers, an identical product, free entry, and long-run economic profit competed away to zero. A monopolist faces the whole market demand curve and produces where marginal revenue equals marginal cost, then charges what that quantity will bear. Monopolistic competition sits between the two — many sellers, but differentiated products give each a sliver of pricing power. Oligopoly is the awkward case: few enough sellers that each must anticipate the others, so outcomes range from nearly competitive to nearly monopolistic depending on whether firms collude.

A practice question

From the question bank, with the reason each wrong option is wrong.

A firm in perfect competition is best described as a:

  1. price taker — correct
  2. price setterWhy not: Setting a price requires a downward-sloping demand curve. A perfectly competitive firm that asks for more sells nothing.
  3. price leaderWhy not: Price leadership is an oligopoly behaviour, where one firm's announced price is followed by rivals watching it.

With an identical product and many rivals, any attempt to charge more loses the entire order book.

A harder one

A profit-maximising monopolist chooses the quantity where:

  1. price equals marginal costWhy not: The competitive outcome. A monopolist sets price above marginal cost, which is the source of the deadweight loss.
  2. marginal revenue equals marginal cost — correct
  3. average cost is at its minimumWhy not: Minimising average cost is not the objective; maximising the gap between revenue and cost is, and the two rarely coincide.

Price is then read off the demand curve at that quantity, and it sits above marginal cost.

The hardest tier

A successful cartel among oligopolists produces an outcome closest to:

  1. perfect competitionWhy not: The cartel exists to avoid the competitive outcome, which is what would happen if its members acted independently.
  2. monopolistic competitionWhy not: That structure has free entry and differentiated products, and yields zero economic profit — the opposite of what a cartel is for.
  3. monopoly — correct

Coordinating output is a way of behaving as one seller, which is why cartels are treated as a competition problem.

In the app: 18 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.

Take the free diagnostic →

More in The Firm and Market Structures