Set out the kinds of equity security
The idea
Common shares carry a residual claim on assets and earnings and normally carry votes; they may be callable or putable, which alters the risk each side bears. Preference shares rank ahead of common for dividends and in liquidation, usually without votes, and may be cumulative, meaning missed dividends accrue and must be paid before any common dividend, or non-cumulative. They may also be participating, sharing in profits above a threshold, and convertible into common. The classification matters because a preference share with a fixed cumulative dividend behaves far more like a bond than like equity.
A practice question
What does cumulative mean in the context of preference shares?
- The dividend rate rises each yearWhy not: That would be a step-up or escalating dividend. Cumulative says nothing about the rate, only about what happens to a payment that is skipped.
- Missed dividends accrue and must be paid before any common dividend — correct
- Dividends are reinvested automaticallyWhy not: That is a reinvestment plan, an arrangement about what the holder does with a dividend once received.
The arrears are a condition on the common shareholders rather than an obligation enforceable like debt, but they must be cleared before the common receives anything.
A harder one
Why does a fixed-rate cumulative preference share behave more like debt than like equity?
- Because it carries voting rightsWhy not: Preference shares usually carry no vote, and a vote would be an equity characteristic in any case.
- Because it has a stated maturityWhy not: Most preference shares are perpetual. What makes them bond-like is the fixed, prior cash flow, not a redemption date.
- Because its claim is fixed and prior — correct
The value of a fixed priority claim responds mainly to interest rates and credit quality. The absence of participation in growth removes the equity characteristic, leaving a fixed stream with a priority claim, which is a bond's profile.
The hardest tier
How does a putable common share shift risk relative to an ordinary one?
- It gives the holder the right to sell back at a set price — correct
- It gives the issuer the right to repurchase, reducing the holder's upsideWhy not: Describes a call. A put is held by the investor, and an option is worth something to whoever holds it.
- It has no effect on risk, only on votingWhy not: The right to sell back at a set price puts a floor under the holding, which is a change in risk and shows in the price.
That transfers downside risk to the issuer. The embedded put is a benefit to the holder and a liability to the issuer, so a putable share is worth more than an otherwise identical ordinary one. A callable share works the opposite way.
In the app: 9 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →