Contrast what goals-based, liability-relative and asset-only allocation each set out to achieve
The idea
The asset-only approach seeks the best trade-off between expected return and risk for the assets themselves, typically maximising a utility or Sharpe ratio measure; liabilities enter only indirectly. The liability-relative approach aims to fund a defined set of obligations, such as pension benefits or insurance claims, so the objective is framed in surplus terms: grow assets minus liabilities while controlling the chance of a shortfall. The goals-based approach, used mainly for individuals, breaks wealth into sub-portfolios, each funding a specific goal such as lifestyle spending, education or a bequest, with a required probability of success for each. The trap is applying an asset-only objective to an investor who has clear liabilities, which can leave a volatile funded status.
In the app: 1 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Overview of Asset Allocation
- Set out what good investment governance looks like and how governance shapes asset allocation decisions
- Construct a client's economic balance sheet and draw out what it implies for how assets should be allocated
- Contrast how risk is defined when allocating on a goals-based, liability-relative or asset-only basis
- Explain how asset classes serve as building blocks for systematic risk exposures and set out the tests for defining an asset class
- Explain how risk factors are used in asset allocation and how they relate to allocation by asset class
- Propose an asset allocation suited to what the investor wants to achieve and the limits they face, and defend it
- Explain how the global market portfolio serves as a neutral starting point for asset allocation
- Set out the strategic choices in implementing an allocation, including how passive or active to be and which vehicles deliver each type of mandate
- Set out the strategic issues to weigh when rebalancing an asset allocation