Propose and defend changes to an asset allocation after a shift in the investor's objectives or constraints
The idea
Revisions are triggered by changes in goals, constraints or capital market beliefs. Typical cases include a large inheritance, retirement, a new goal, a pension plan closing to new members or freezing benefits, or a change in a foundation's spending rule. Work through what changed: required return, risk capacity, horizon, liquidity, tax, and liabilities. A plan that freezes benefits has a shorter, more certain liability, which argues for a larger hedging portfolio; a retiree losing salary income has less capacity for risk; a windfall may lift capacity but not necessarily willingness. A good justification links each revised weight to a specific changed fact. The trap is revising the allocation in response to market moves instead of investor circumstances.
In the app: 1 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Asset Allocation with Real-World Constraints
- Explain how portfolio size, cash flow needs, horizon, and regulatory and other limits constrain asset allocation
- Explain how taxes shape both the choice of asset allocation and the approach to rebalancing
- Explain the role of temporary deviations from the strategic asset allocation
- Recognise the behavioural biases that affect asset allocation and propose ways to counter them