Explain the forces that pushed markets toward electronic trading
The idea
Electronic trading spread because it lowers costs: computers match orders more cheaply than floor traders and dealers. It is also faster and more accurate, reducing errors in execution and settlement, and it creates complete audit trails that help regulators and compliance teams. Regulation encouraged competition among trading venues and required best execution, which favoured systems able to route orders across venues. Growth in trading by institutions and in algorithmic strategies created demand for speed and automation, while technology costs fell. For a portfolio manager, the result is narrower spreads and lower commissions, but also fragmented liquidity and competition from faster traders. A trap is assuming lower quoted spreads mean lower total trading costs.
In the app: 1 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Trading Costs and Electronic Markets
- Explain what makes up the cost of executing a trade, both visible and hidden
- Compute effective spreads and VWAP-based estimates of transaction cost, and explain what they show
- Explain how implementation shortfall measures the cost of trading
- Explain what market fragmentation is and why it matters
- Name the main kinds of electronic trader and set out how they differ
- Explain what electronic trading systems look like and what they are used for
- Explain the edge that low-latency traders hold over slower market participants
- Explain the dangers electronic trading creates and the tools regulators use to contain them
- Explain the manipulative trading practices that live market monitoring can uncover