Explain the main ways active equity portfolios are put together
The idea
Construction approaches differ along two axes: systematic against discretionary, and bottom-up against top-down. Systematic managers apply rules and optimisers across broad universes; discretionary managers rely on judgement and conviction. Bottom-up managers let exposures emerge from stock choices, while top-down managers set macro or factor exposures first. Within these, position weights can be set by heuristics such as equal weighting or conviction tiers, by constraints relative to the benchmark such as sector and stock deviation limits, or by optimisation that maximises expected alpha minus penalties for risk and cost. Hybrids are common. The trap is treating an optimiser as objective: it magnifies errors in expected return estimates, so its output is usually tightly constrained or blended with judgement.
In the app: 1 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Active Equity Investing: Portfolio Construction
- Explain which features of a manager's philosophy drive the way the portfolio is assembled
- Contrast Active Share with active risk and relate each measure to the strategy a manager follows
- Explain how risk budgeting is used when building a portfolio
- Explain the risk measures built into equity portfolio construction and how caps on them alter the portfolio
- Explain the effect of assets under management, holding size, trading liquidity and turnover on choices made in building equity portfolios
- Judge how efficiently a portfolio's structure serves its investment mandate
- Weigh the risks, costs and alpha potential of long-only, long extension, equitized market-neutral and long/short equity portfolio structures