Explain what usually decides which class of trading algorithm is chosen
The idea
The main classes are schedule-based algorithms (VWAP, TWAP and percentage of volume), arrival price or implementation shortfall algorithms, liquidity-seeking algorithms that search lit and dark venues, and algorithms that target the close. Selection depends on order size relative to volume, urgency, the security's liquidity and spread, volatility and the trade's benchmark. Schedule-based algorithms suit large, low-urgency orders in liquid names benchmarked to VWAP. Arrival price algorithms front-load execution for urgent orders or where price may move away. Liquidity-seeking algorithms suit large orders in illiquid names, taking liquidity opportunistically. Close-targeting algorithms suit index funds. The trap is ignoring that a percentage-of-volume algorithm leaves the completion time uncertain and can trade more when momentum is against the order.
In the app: 1 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Trade Strategy and Execution
- Explain why investors trade and how the reason shapes the trading approach
- Explain the factors that feed into choosing a trading strategy
- Contrast the reference prices used to judge trade execution
- Propose a trading strategy suited to given facts and defend the choice
- Contrast trade implementation features across spot currency, OTC derivative, futures and options, fixed-income and equity markets
- Explain how the cost of a trade is measured and work out that cost
- Judge how well a trade was executed
- Assess whether a firm's trading processes, disclosures and records meet good governance standards