Weigh derivatives against physical (cash market) trades as ways to set or change asset class and risk exposures, in terms of costs and benefits
The idea
Futures, forwards, swaps and options can change exposure quickly and cheaply without disturbing the underlying holdings, which matters when assets are illiquid, run by external managers or would trigger taxes if sold. They need little capital upfront. Their drawbacks are roll costs and basis risk when the derivative does not track the exposure precisely, margin and collateral calls that create liquidity needs, counterparty risk on OTC contracts, and hidden leverage. Cash market trades are simple and permanent, suit lasting strategic changes and avoid roll and basis problems, but incur bid–ask spreads, market impact and taxes, and take time for illiquid assets. The trap is ignoring collateral: an overlay can force sales of other assets in a crisis.
In the app: 1 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Case Study in Portfolio Management: Institutional (Endowment)
- Explain the tools available to manage liquidity risk in a portfolio
- Explain how an investor with a long horizon can harvest the illiquidity premium over time
- Analyse an asset allocation and its construction against the portfolio's return and risk targets and cash needs, and propose actions to close any gaps
- Apply the CFA Institute Code and Standards to the conduct of people who choose external managers
- Show how derivatives overlays can implement tactical allocation shifts and portfolio rebalancing
- Explain how ESG factors enter the management of long-horizon institutional portfolios