Interpret where a portfolio's returns came from using a given attribution method
The idea
In the Brinson–Fachler model, for each sector: allocation = (wp − wb) × (Rb,sector − Rb,total). Selection rewards holdings that beat their sector's index: selection = wb × (Rp,sector − Rb,sector). Interaction captures the joint effect of the weighting and the stock choice: interaction = (wp − wb) × (Rp,sector − Rb,sector). Suppose a portfolio holds 30% in a sector the benchmark weights at 20%; the sector index returns 8% against 5% for the whole benchmark, and the manager's holdings in it return 10%. Allocation is 0.10 × 3% = 0.30%, selection 0.20 × 2% = 0.40% and interaction 0.10 × 2% = 0.20%. Brinson–Hood–Beebower uses the sector's own benchmark return, not its excess over the total, so overweighting a sector with a positive but below-benchmark return wrongly looks helpful. Factor-based attribution instead splits return into exposure × factor return plus a residual.
Formulas
Allocation effect (Brinson–Fachler)
allocation = (wp − wb) × (Rb,sector − Rb,total)
- wp
- the portfolio's weight in the sector
- wb
- the benchmark's weight in the sector
- Rb,sector
- the benchmark's return in the sector
- Rb,total
- the whole benchmark's return
Measured against the benchmark's total return, so overweighting a sector that beat the benchmark adds value even if the sector fell. Summed over sectors, allocation, selection and interaction add up to the active return.
Selection effect
selection = wb × (Rp,sector − Rb,sector)
- wb
- the benchmark's weight in the sector
- Rp,sector
- the portfolio's return in the sector
- Rb,sector
- the benchmark's return in the sector
Weighted by the benchmark's weight, so it measures stock picking within the sector as if the sector were held at benchmark weight.
Interaction effect
interaction = (wp − wb) × (Rp,sector − Rb,sector)
- wp
- the portfolio's weight in the sector
- wb
- the benchmark's weight in the sector
- Rp,sector
- the portfolio's return in the sector
- Rb,sector
- the benchmark's return in the sector
The joint effect of overweighting a sector and outperforming within it. Some reports fold it into selection, so check which convention a report uses before comparing managers.
In the app: 2 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Portfolio Performance Evaluation
- Explain what performance measurement, attribution and appraisal each contribute to evaluating a portfolio and how the three link together
- Set out the features that make a performance attribution process effective
- Distinguish attribution of return from attribution of risk, and macro-level from micro-level return attribution
- Explain how transactions-based, holdings-based and returns-based attribution work, with the strengths and weaknesses of each
- Interpret the results produced by attribution analysis of a fixed-income portfolio
- Discuss the factors that guide the choice of a risk attribution method
- Separate the part of investment results due to the asset owner's decisions from the part due to the manager, and interpret each
- Explain the purposes served by liability-based benchmarks
- Set out the main kinds of asset-based benchmark
- Discuss the tests used to judge whether a benchmark is sound
- Explain how a misspecified benchmark distorts attribution and appraisal analysis
- Set out the difficulties that arise when choosing benchmarks for alternative investments
- Compute and interpret maximum drawdown, drawdown duration, upside and downside capture ratios, the appraisal ratio and the Sortino ratio
- Explain where appraisal measures and associated metrics fall short
- Assess whether an investment manager's results reflect genuine skill