Charta is on Google Play: practise on the go. Get the app
Charta

Discuss the factors that guide the choice of a risk attribution method

CFA® Level III · Performance Measurement · Portfolio Performance Evaluation · L3.PF.1.g

The idea

The right risk attribution depends on two features of the mandate. First, is it judged against a benchmark or on absolute return? Relative mandates decompose active risk (tracking error); absolute mandates decompose total volatility. Second, how does the manager decide? A bottom-up stock picker is best served by each position's contribution to risk; a top-down allocator by the risk arising from each allocation and selection decision; a factor-based process by the risk explained by each factor exposure plus specific risk. A position's contribution to volatility is its weight × its covariance with the portfolio ÷ the portfolio's standard deviation, and these contributions sum to the total. An approach that does not mirror the process produces figures that nobody can act on.

In the app: 1 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.

Take the free diagnostic →

More in Portfolio Performance Evaluation