Discuss the investment policy approaches adopted by institutional investors
The idea
Institutions tend to follow one of several models. The Norway-style model uses mainly passive, public-market exposure with low cost and high transparency. The endowment model allocates heavily to alternatives and active managers to exploit a long horizon and illiquidity premium, but demands strong governance and manager access. The traditional model holds mostly listed equities and bonds with some active management. Liability-driven investing ties the portfolio to liabilities, typical of pensions and insurers, often with a hedging portfolio and a return-seeking portfolio. The choice depends on horizon, liquidity needs, scale, governance resources and the nature of liabilities. The endowment model does not suit an institution without the scale or expertise to access top-tier private managers.
In the app: 1 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Portfolio Management for Institutional Investors
- Discuss the features that institutional investors typically share
- Discuss for each type of institutional investor who has a stake in the portfolio, what it owes, how long it can invest and how much liquidity it needs
- Explain what the legal, regulatory and tax constraints on each type of institutional investor concentrate on
- Evaluate a private DB plan's risk profile in light of five factors: how well funded it is, the sponsor's financial strength, how the sponsor's business interacts with plan assets, plan design and the characteristics of the workforce
- Evaluate an institutional investor's investment policy statement
- Evaluate the portfolios held by a private DB pension plan, a sovereign wealth fund, a university endowment and a private foundation
- Explain what shapes how banks and insurance companies manage their balance sheets