Evaluate an institutional investor's investment policy statement
The idea
An institutional IPS should define the mission and objectives, the return target and risk tolerance, the constraints (liquidity, horizon, legal and regulatory, tax, unique circumstances), the strategic asset allocation with ranges and benchmarks, rebalancing policy, governance responsibilities, and reporting and review procedures. Evaluation checks internal consistency: is the return target achievable given the risk tolerance and allocation, is liquidity adequate for spending or benefits, and do constraints reflect the investor's regulation and liabilities? For an endowment, required return should cover spending, inflation and costs; for example, 5% spending, 2.5% inflation and 0.5% costs imply (1.05)(1.025)(1.005) − 1 ≈ 8.16%. A trap is accepting a return target that the allocation cannot plausibly deliver.
In the app: 2 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Portfolio Management for Institutional Investors
- Discuss the features that institutional investors typically share
- Discuss the investment policy approaches adopted by institutional investors
- Discuss for each type of institutional investor who has a stake in the portfolio, what it owes, how long it can invest and how much liquidity it needs
- Explain what the legal, regulatory and tax constraints on each type of institutional investor concentrate on
- Evaluate a private DB plan's risk profile in light of five factors: how well funded it is, the sponsor's financial strength, how the sponsor's business interacts with plan assets, plan design and the characteristics of the workforce
- Evaluate the portfolios held by a private DB pension plan, a sovereign wealth fund, a university endowment and a private foundation
- Explain what shapes how banks and insurance companies manage their balance sheets