Discuss how behavioural factors shape the decisions of an investment team and propose ways to limit their influence
The idea
Teams can compound individual biases. Groupthink and conformity suppress dissent, especially when a senior member speaks first; overconfidence and the illusion of control encourage concentrated bets; confirmation bias filters evidence toward existing views; anchoring ties forecasts to earlier numbers; loss aversion and the disposition effect delay selling losers; and herding pulls the team toward consensus positions. Mitigation relies on structure: collect written views independently before discussion, rotate a devil's advocate, let junior members speak first, use checklists and explicit sell disciplines, run pre-mortems on major decisions, and keep a decision journal reviewed against outcomes. Diversity of background and clear accountability help. When selecting a manager, look for evidence that such safeguards operate in practice, not just on paper.
In the app: 1 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Investment Manager Selection
- Set out the stages of the manager selection process, with due diligence among them
- Distinguish Type I from Type II errors when deciding whether to hire or keep a manager
- Explain how style analysis, both holdings-based and returns-based, supports the choice of investment managers
- Explain how maximum drawdown, drawdown duration, capture ratios on the upside and downside, and up/down capture help in assessing managers
- Assess the investment philosophy of a manager and the process by which it reaches investment decisions
- Weigh the benefits and costs of separate accounts against those of pooled investment vehicles
- Contrast the main forms of investment manager contract, covering their key provisions and their advantages and drawbacks
- Set out the three standard ways a performance-based fee can be structured
- Analyse an illustrative performance-based fee schedule and interpret its outcomes