Analyse an illustrative performance-based fee schedule and interpret its outcomes
The idea
Work through the schedule period by period. Take a base fee of 0.4% plus 20% of return above the benchmark, with a high-water mark on cumulative excess return. Outperform by 3% in year 1: the fee is 0.4% + 0.6% = 1.0%. Underperform by 2% in year 2: the fee is 0.4%, and the 2% shortfall must be recovered. Outperform by 3% in year 3: only the 1% above the mark earns the bonus, so the fee is 0.6%. Against a flat 0.8% fee, the break-even excess return is (0.8% − 0.4%) ÷ 20% = 2%. The client pays more than the flat fee only in years when excess return above the mark tops 2%, but the asymmetric payoff can encourage risk-taking, so check caps, hurdles and the measurement period.
In the app: 2 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Investment Manager Selection
- Set out the stages of the manager selection process, with due diligence among them
- Distinguish Type I from Type II errors when deciding whether to hire or keep a manager
- Explain how style analysis, both holdings-based and returns-based, supports the choice of investment managers
- Explain how maximum drawdown, drawdown duration, capture ratios on the upside and downside, and up/down capture help in assessing managers
- Assess the investment philosophy of a manager and the process by which it reaches investment decisions
- Discuss how behavioural factors shape the decisions of an investment team and propose ways to limit their influence
- Weigh the benefits and costs of separate accounts against those of pooled investment vehicles
- Contrast the main forms of investment manager contract, covering their key provisions and their advantages and drawbacks
- Set out the three standard ways a performance-based fee can be structured